• HOME
  • About Journal
    • Historical evolution
    • Journal Honors
  • Editorial Board
    • Members of Committee
    • Director of the Committee
    • President and Editor in chief
  • Submission Guide
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Manuscript Processing Flow
    • Model Text
    • Procedures for Submission
  • Academic Influence
  • Open Access
  • Ethics&Policies
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Peer Review Process
    • Academic Misconduct Identification and Treatment
    • Advertising and Marketing
    • Correction and Retraction
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Authorship & Copyright
  • Contact Us
  • Chinese
Site search        
文章摘要
基于动态测量理论的数据处理和不确定度评定
Data Processing and Uncertainty Evaluation Based on Dynamic Measurement Theory
Received:August 28, 2014  Revised:August 28, 2014
DOI:
中文关键词: 动态测量  测量不确定度  A类评定  贝叶斯评定
英文关键词: dynamic measurement, uncertainty of measurement, Type A evaluation, Bayesian evaluation
基金项目:
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
lihuiqi North China Electric Power University, Baoding, huiqili@263.net 
wangkaihong* North China Electric Power University, Baoding, wangkaihong620@163.com 
Li Si State Grid Beijing Information & Telecommunication Company  
Hits: 2308
Download times: 693
中文摘要:
      测量过程中影响因素多且相对复杂,并且具有时变性、随机性,动态测量较之静态测量更具有普遍性。基于动态测量理论对测量数据进行处理,同时为了说明处理后的数据有更大的使用价值,可对数据进行测量不确定度评定。不确定度越小,测量结果的质量越高,使用价值越大。针对直接测量数据和经动态测量理论处理得到的数据先后进行A类评定和贝叶斯评定,通过比较发现,贝叶斯评定优于A类评定;同直接测量数据相比,经动态测量理论处理后的数据,无论A类评定还是贝叶斯评定,不确定度小、可靠性高,从而说明处理后的数据更接近真值,同时也说明了动态测量理论在数据处理方面的可行性和正确性。
英文摘要:
      Many Relatively complex factors affect the measurement process, both time-varying and randomness. Compared with static measurements, dynamic measurements are more widely used. This paper processes the measurement data based on the dynamic measurement theory and evaluates uncertainty of measurement to illustrate the processed data with greater use value. Uncertainty is smaller, the higher the quality of measurement results, the greater the value of the use. Type A evaluation and Bayesian evaluation are done for the raw data and the processed data after dynamic measurement theory. Through comparative study, the conclusion is obtained. Bayesian evaluation is better than type A evaluation. Compared with raw data, the uncertainty evaluation of The processed data after dynamic measurement theory is small, and the reliability is high,which shows the processed data closer to the true value, but also illustrates the dynamic measurement theory feasibility and correctness in the data processing.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close
  • Home
  • About Journal
    • Historical evolution
    • Journal Honors
  • Editorial Board
    • Members of Committee
    • Director of the Committee
    • President and Editor in chief
  • Submission Guide
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Manuscript Processing Flow
    • Model Text
    • Procedures for Submission
  • Academic Influence
  • Open Access
  • Ethics&Policies
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Peer Review Process
    • Academic Misconduct Identification and Treatment
    • Advertising and Marketing
    • Correction and Retraction
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Authorship & Copyright
  • Contact Us
  • 中文页面
Address: No.2000, Chuangxin Road, Songbei District, Harbin, China    Zip code: 150028
E-mail: dcyb@vip.163.com    Telephone: 0451-86611021
© 2012 Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation
黑ICP备11006624号-1
Support:Beijing Qinyun Technology Development Co., Ltd