• HOME
  • About Journal
    • Historical evolution
    • Journal Honors
  • Editorial Board
    • Members of Committee
    • Director of the Committee
    • President and Editor in chief
  • Submission Guide
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Manuscript Processing Flow
    • Model Text
    • Procedures for Submission
  • Academic Influence
  • Open Access
  • Ethics&Policies
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Peer Review Process
    • Academic Misconduct Identification and Treatment
    • Advertising and Marketing
    • Correction and Retraction
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Authorship & Copyright
  • Contact Us
  • Chinese
Site search        
文章摘要
Class A、S及B类测量方法对谐波测量的差异性研究
A comparative study on the measurement aggregation methods ofClass A、S and B to harmonic measurement
Received:July 22, 2015  Revised:July 22, 2015
DOI:
中文关键词: 谐波  仪器  测量方法  集合  差异性
英文关键词: Harmonic  Instruments  Measurement Methods  Aggregation  Difference
基金项目:国家电网公司科技项目支持((SGRI-DL-71-14-004))
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Zhu Mingxing Power Quality Engineering Research Center,Ministry of Education xysah@163.com 
Tang Tao* Institute of Electrical Engineering and Automation of Anhui University 670171849@qq.com 
Chen Bing Jiangsu Electric Power Company Research Institute  
Gao Min Anhui WuYi Electrical Technology Co., Ltd  
Hits: 1943
Download times: 886
中文摘要:
      波动性负荷在运行过程中会向公用电网注入大量的谐波和间谐波,严重影响了电网的安全稳定运行。GB/T 17626.30规定对每一个待测参数都有Class A、S和B三类测量方法,而国内的电能质量测试仪器长期存在不同仪器采用不同测量方法导致测量结果互有差异的问题。本文基于Class A、S和B三类谐波测量方法的定义和算法,结合点焊机和电弧炉两种典型波动性负荷的实测数据,分析并对比了此三类测量方法在谐波测量中的最大值和95%概率大值的差异性。最后从实际工程应用的角度,给出了三类测量方法的适用场合和相关结论。
英文摘要:
      Plenty of harmonic and inter-harmonic in the utility grid injected by fluctuating loads strongly impact on the safe and stable operation of power grid. According to GB/T 17626.30, there exist three kinds of measurement methods, namely class A、S and B, for each parameter measured, however they are adopted by different instruments leading to difference between measuring result in domestic power quality test instruments which become a long-standing issue. Based on the definition and algorithm of the three measurement methods of Class A、S and B, this paper analyzes and compares the effects of the three measuring methods on harmonic analysis by their maximum value and 95% probability maximum value separately with the measured data of two typical fluctuating loads spot welder and EAF. Finally from the perspective of practical engineering application, it proposes the applications and relevant conclusions for the three measuring methods respectively.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close
  • Home
  • About Journal
    • Historical evolution
    • Journal Honors
  • Editorial Board
    • Members of Committee
    • Director of the Committee
    • President and Editor in chief
  • Submission Guide
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Manuscript Processing Flow
    • Model Text
    • Procedures for Submission
  • Academic Influence
  • Open Access
  • Ethics&Policies
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Peer Review Process
    • Academic Misconduct Identification and Treatment
    • Advertising and Marketing
    • Correction and Retraction
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Authorship & Copyright
  • Contact Us
  • 中文页面
Address: No.2000, Chuangxin Road, Songbei District, Harbin, China    Zip code: 150028
E-mail: dcyb@vip.163.com    Telephone: 0451-86611021
© 2012 Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation
黑ICP备11006624号-1
Support:Beijing Qinyun Technology Development Co., Ltd