• HOME
  • About Journal
    • Historical evolution
    • Journal Honors
  • Editorial Board
    • Members of Committee
    • Director of the Committee
    • President and Editor in chief
  • Submission Guide
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Manuscript Processing Flow
    • Model Text
    • Procedures for Submission
  • Academic Influence
  • Open Access
  • Ethics&Policies
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Peer Review Process
    • Academic Misconduct Identification and Treatment
    • Advertising and Marketing
    • Correction and Retraction
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Authorship & Copyright
  • Contact Us
  • Chinese
Site search        
文章摘要
基于FPP改进的FAHP方法和健康指数理论的电压凹陷严重程度评估
The severity evaluation of voltage sag based on multi-attribute decision-making using FPP extended FAHP and healthy index theory
Received:November 16, 2018  Revised:November 16, 2018
DOI:10.19753/j.issn1001-1390.2020.07.006
中文关键词: 电压凹陷  严重程度评估  多准则决策(MCDM)  模糊偏好规划(FPP)  模糊层次分析法(FAHP)  健康指数理论
英文关键词: voltage  sag, severity  evaluation, multi-criteria  decision-making (MCDM), fuzzy  preference programming (FPP), fuzzy  analytic hierarchy  process (FAHP), healthy  index theory
基金项目:
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Wang Miao* School of Electronics and Information Engineering,Anhui University,Anhui Province Hefei City p16201106@stu.ahu.edu.cn 
Cheng Zhiyou School of Electronics and Information Engineering,Anhui University,Anhui Province Hefei City czy@ahu.edu.cn 
Hits: 1506
Download times: 509
中文摘要:
      电压凹陷是影响电能质量的重要问题之一。文中重点研究的问题是如何对电压凹陷的严重程度进行整体评估,不再局限于电压凹陷的单一属性评估。为此文中提出了一种改进的多准则决策(MCDM)方法。首先根据专家的语义判断,建立多准则决策问题的判断矩阵。其次提出了模糊偏好规划(FPP)改进的模糊层次分析法(FAHP)来计算包含3个因素的评价模型的权重,即:特征因子、计算因子和谐波因子以及包含的6个指标。最后,文中结合了健康指数理论,利用权重和百分制得分获得直观的严重程度评分和等级。在电压凹陷验证样例中,使用文中方法得到的严重程度评估结果与实际经验判断几乎吻合。
英文摘要:
      The voltage sag is one of the important problems of power quality. This paper fixates on the question how to generally evaluate the severity of voltage sag rather than to study a single part unilaterally. Therefore, this paper proposes an improved multi-criteria decision-making method. Accordingly, judgment matrices are first built for the problem of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) by inquiring experienced experts. Second, the fuzzy preference programming (FPP) extended fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) method is presented to calculate the weights of evaluation model containing 3 factors, i.e., characteristic factor, calculation factor and harmonic factor, as well as 6 indicators. Finally, this paper follows the healthy index theory to obtain the final intuitionistic evaluation result by weights and centesimal system. In the validation example of voltage sag, the result of severity evaluation obtained by this method is almost consistent with the actual experience judgement.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close
  • Home
  • About Journal
    • Historical evolution
    • Journal Honors
  • Editorial Board
    • Members of Committee
    • Director of the Committee
    • President and Editor in chief
  • Submission Guide
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Manuscript Processing Flow
    • Model Text
    • Procedures for Submission
  • Academic Influence
  • Open Access
  • Ethics&Policies
    • Publication Ethics Statement
    • Peer Review Process
    • Academic Misconduct Identification and Treatment
    • Advertising and Marketing
    • Correction and Retraction
    • Conflict of Interest
    • Authorship & Copyright
  • Contact Us
  • 中文页面
Address: No.2000, Chuangxin Road, Songbei District, Harbin, China    Zip code: 150028
E-mail: dcyb@vip.163.com    Telephone: 0451-86611021
© 2012 Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation
黑ICP备11006624号-1
Support:Beijing Qinyun Technology Development Co., Ltd